Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4331 14
Original file (NR4331 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JDR
Docket No: 4331-14
4 May 2015

This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request
dated 25 February 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and
were advised in our letter that your application was denied.

Because your application was submitted with new evidence not
previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of
justice to review your most recent application based on the new
evidence provided. In this regard, your current request has
been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session on

24 April 2015. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application and any material
submitted in support of your application.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined that the statements you provided,
even though not previously considered by the Board, were
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. A review of your recent application and
attachment reveals that again your request must be denied. In
this regard, the Board found that your contentions are
insufficient to warrant further consideration in your case. In
the absence of sufficient. material evidence for reconsideration,
the decision of the Board is final, and your only recourse would
be to initiate action, at no cost to the Board, to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction.

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11277 14

    Original file (NR11277 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this regard, your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of your recent application reveals that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13252 14

    Original file (NR13252 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 15 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11978 14

    Original file (NR11978 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the documentation that you provided, even though not previously considered by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11509 14

    Original file (NR11509 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the documentation that you provided, even though not previously considered by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12510 14

    Original file (NR12510 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 7 April 2015. In the absence of sufficiently material evidence for reconsideration, the decision of the Board is final, and your only recourse would be to initiate action, at no cost to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2170 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR2170 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR2170 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR2170 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Your assertion of PTSD was carefully considered by the Board in light of the Secretary of Defense’s Memorandum “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR6702 15_Redacted

    Original file (NR6702 15_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 August 2015. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11606 14

    Original file (NR11606 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11076 14

    Original file (NR11076 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 3 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined that the statements you provided, even though not previously considered by the Board, were insufficient...